INPRO/SEAL – Evaluating Carbon Ring Alternatives

INPRO/SEAL – Evaluating Carbon Ring Alternatives

Operators of general-purpose steam turbines have long stated the shortcomings of conventional carbon ring seals. One drawback is wear at the ring’s inner bore, which gradually increases shaft clearance and steam leakage and leads to regular replacement—as often as four times per year. Despite their disadvantages, carbon rings remain the standard in general-purpose steam turbine sealing. Because carbon rings are simple to install and have a replacement cost of less than $1,000 for a complete set, the cost of maintaining sealing with carbon rings may seem modest.

However, there are further costs associated with the wear and potential breakage of carbon rings, including higher water costs resulting from steam losses and degraded bearing performance because of oil contamination and higher operating temperatures.

For operators looking to reduce steam leakage and increase equipment reliability, two primary alternatives to carbon rings are available on the market: mechanical seals and the floating brush seal.

Mechanical Seals

Mechanical seals used in general-purpose steam turbines are a derivative of dry gas seals. A unique profile—spiral grooves—on one of the seal faces draws in steam, which creates a pressure dam that pushes the rotating and stationary seal faces slightly apart for a non-contacting, film-riding sealing interface. Resulting leakage is extremely low and measured in parts per million.

With a design distinctly dissimilar to conventional carbon rings, the mechanical seal requires major modifications to a turbine’s existing gland box configuration. On steam turbines where the steam chest and gland boxes are individual components, the mechanical seal assembly can be bolted to either end of the steam chest in place of the carbon ring gland boxes. On turbines where the steam chest and gland boxes are one piece, major machining is required to fit the mechanical seals.

In addition to gland box modifications, the turbine shaft may require modification to secure the seal’s rotating assembly. Final setting of the mechanical seal requires careful alignment with the rotor and casing to ensure proper sealing between the rotating and stationary seal faces.

The hardware cost for a set of mechanical seals to replace the inlet and exhaust gland boxes can range from $20,000 to $30,000. In terms of hardware, installation and downtime costs, a mechanical seal upgrade easily can cost more than half the price of a new turbine.

The life of a mechanical seal is directly affected by steam quality. Mechanical seals work best in dry steam conditions under a continuous duty cycle to alleviate condensate formation. Even in such an environment, steam impurities will crystallize at the pressure dam over time, which will increase face separation and leakage.

Intermittent duty cycles can promote the formation of condensate within the steam lines, steam chest and gland boxes while the turbine is at rest.

Although operators may blow condensate from the system prior to startup, residual condensate can be problematic for the mechanical seal. The flashing of the condensate into a gas, which can best be described as a small explosion, can catastrophically damage the seal faces.

Floating Brush Seals

The second candidate for replacing carbon rings is a floating brush seal (FBS). An FBS combines a carbon seal with brush seal technology encased in a lightweight stainless steel band. This technology is designed to withstand condensate flashing while providing a lower, more stable leakage rate.

As a floating seal, the FBS tends to be more tolerant of vibration, bearing failures and radial movement than other options. The brush seal acts as the primary shaft seal and faces the high-pressure steam. It provides immediate pressure reduction while its bristles filter out steam contaminants, protecting downstream carbon rings. The carbon ring of the FBS provides a face seal against the downstream gland wall or separator plate.

Designed to fit the same space as a carbon ring, an FBS can be a drop-in replacement. The seal has a split design, with two segments held together by a garter spring. Its self-centering assembly may eliminate the need for an involved alignment procedure in some applications.

Operators trained in the replacement of carbon rings can replace a carbon ring with an FBS, which has only two segments versus the carbon ring’s three.

With a complete steam turbine upgrade to FBS technology costing no more than half— and maybe even one-quarter—of the cost of mechanical seal hardware and installation, an FBS may be a more cost-effective option for many operators.

A plant must evaluate which candidate for carbon ring replacement fits all the required criteria: suitability for operating conditions, including steam quality and duty cycle; sufficient reduction of steam losses; improved reliability; and low investment and maintenance costs.

SOURCE: https://www.inpro-seal.com/en_US/about-us/in-the-news/?ID=45

Evaluating Carbon Ring Alternatives
Operators should investigate the pros and cons of each option to determine the best t for their applications.

Download article:

article_IS_Steam-Leakage-Reduction_Pumps&Systems_Aug2016

About the author: 

Peter Zanini is the business development and product line director for brush seals at Inpro/Seal and its parent company, Waukesha Bearings Corporation. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

DOE has set new standards for commercial and industrial pumps

DOE has set new standards for commercial and industrial pumps

Rulemaking for Commercial and Industrial Pumps Energy Conservation Standards

The Department of Energy (DOE) has set new standards for commercial and industrial pumps. Pumps exist in numerous applications, including agriculture, oil and gas production, water and wastewater, manufacturing, mining, and commercial building systems. 

Learn more:

https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/ruleid/14

Contact-free indirect measurement for hygienic applications

The non-contact mode of measurement is very interesting for hygienic applications in the food-, pharmaceutical- and cosmetics industry, as well as for industrial applications with thick, adhesive and solid containing liquids. Experience has shown that conventional volumetric flow meters quickly come to their limit, while other measuring procedures are often very complex and/or are not suitable for mobile use.

The non-contact mode of measurement with impulse sensor is a reliable and economic option. Here is the measurement effected – hygienically and free from wear – without direct contact with the liquid being pumped.

lutz-sensor lutz-sensor-2

Principle
According to the rotating positive displacement principle the characteristic curve of an eccentric screw type pump is nearly linear. It is therefore possible to determine the pumped liquid amount by means of the number of shaft rotations. With a variance of +/- 1 impulse per measuring process the reproduction accuracy is very high, as long as the system factors e.g. viscosity, pressure, hose diameter, temperature and flow are steady. According to the demand of precision and abrasiveness of the medium the calibration factor must be temporarily adjusted to the wear of the pump hydraulic system. When using a motor with integrated frequency converter the flow capacity of the pump can be individually adjusted to the respective application conditions.

Function
An impulse transmitter transfers magnetic impulses of the rotating motor shaft contact-free to the impulse sensor. The measured impulses are evaluated in the Lutz operating unit BE10 and are read out by means of the determined calibration factor as transferred flow quantity via the display. By adding the relay module RM10 and respective connecting cables the system also can be used as filling station with volume pre-selection (batch function) – as known from the modular Lutz flow meters. Optionally the reed-impulses also can be evaluated via evaluation units provided by the customer and an external control.

lutz-construction

Construction
Hygienic aspects and specific demands were considered on construction by which the system partially considerably differs from  competitive solutions:

  • Compact and easy to handle unit for a maximum mobility
  • All current- & data-carrying elements at the motor-/lifting device unit
  • Pump tube detachable from motor-/lifting device by means of quick-action coupling
  • Pump tube without electronic components enables a thorough cleaning and disinfection also by water jet or in cleaning machines
  • Easy handling and control via the Lutz operating unit with touchscreen display and menu navigation in plain text
  • Can be combined with relay module RM10 and other modules of the Lutz flow meter programme
  • Lutz eccentric screw pumps B70V-D which are currently used can be economically retrofitted

Source: Lutz Pumps http://www.lutzpumps.com/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-525/451_read-12932/

Fluid Dynamics: The Study of Fluids and How Forces Affect Them

Fluid dynamics is one of two branches of fluid mechanics, which is the study of fluids and how forces affect them.

Fluid dynamics is “the branch of applied science that is concerned with the movement of liquids and gases,” according to the American Heritage Dictionary. Fluid dynamics is one of two branches of fluid mechanics, which is the study of fluids and how forces affect them. (The other branch is fluid statics, which deals with fluids at rest.)

Scientists across several fields study fluid dynamics. Fluid dynamics provides methods for studying the evolution of starsocean currents, weather patterns, plate tectonics and even blood circulation. Some important technological applications of fluid dynamics include rocket engines, wind turbines, oil pipelines and air conditioning systems.

Read full article: Live Science: What Is Fluid Dynamics?